Virality Without Velocity: The Pat McGrath Labs Lesson.
The skills that make you a visionary are not the same skills that scale a business. And the gap between inspiration and execution is where billion-dollar valuations go to die.
Pat McGrath is widely considered the most influential makeup artist of her generation. She defined the look of the 90s through her i-D covers, created era-defining runway moments for decades, and in 2021 became the first makeup artist to receive a damehood from the British Empire. When she launched her namesake brand in 2015, the industry expected her to do for beauty what Ralph Lauren did for American fashion and build a world, scale it globally, and own a category.
Ten years later, the brand’s assets are going to auction. Hilco Global is managing the sale. Bids are due January 26, 2026, with a public auction the following day. The trademarks, logos, and intellectual property that made “Mother” a household name offered as-is, where-is, to whoever shows up with a chequebook.
The valuation collapse tells the story. In 2018, French private equity firm Eurazeo invested at a $1 billion valuation, betting that McGrath could build the next billion-dollar beauty empire. By 2021, Eurazeo had quietly exited. That same year, Sienna Investment Managers bought a 14.4% stake for €168 million, valuing the company at €1.2 billion. One year later, Sienna wrote down that investment by 88%. By 2024, they estimated their stake was worth just €21.5 million, implying a total company valuation of around €149 million.
The tempting explanation is market conditions. The pandemic shifted preferences toward minimal makeup. The “clean girl” trend didn’t favour bold colour. Consumer habits changed. All of that is true, and all of it is incomplete. Because the real story isn’t what happened to the market, but what happened inside the company when the market handed them the most significant opportunity they’d ever had.
Virality Killed Them
On January 25, 2024, models walked beneath the Pont Alexandre III in Paris for Maison Margiela’s couture show. Their skin looked like porcelain, pearlescent, plasticine, almost inhuman. John Galliano had asked McGrath to create something otherworldly, and she delivered. The internet lost its collective mind.
Google searches for Pat McGrath spiked immediately. TikTok exploded with speculation about what products she’d used and when consumers could buy them. This was arguably the most viral beauty moment in years. McGrath had created runway magic before, but the Margiela glass skin hit different. This was the age of instant replication. The audience was dying to be able to buy a product at home to recreate this look.
This is where Pat McGrath Labs faltered. She wasn’t working on a glass skin product tied to this moment. According to multiple reports, the team hadn’t been developing anything related to the look. The most viral moment of McGrath’s career arrived, and the company had nothing to sell.
The brand scrambled to schedule an online masterclass. But five days after the show, makeup artist Erin Parsons, who had worked as McGrath’s first assistant earlier in her career, posted a TikTok revealing the technique. A $4 Freeman cucumber mask, a drugstore peel-off mask that she diluted with water and applied via airbrush. The video racked up over 2 million views. The mystery was solved, the conversation moved on, and someone else got the credit for cracking the code.
McGrath eventually did her own TikTok Live. “I’ve never seen a makeup look go so viral,” she told the tens of thousands watching. But by then, the cultural moment had already been claimed. The window was closing.
It took nearly a full year, until January 30, 2025, for Pat McGrath Labs to release Skin Fetish: Glass 001 Artistry Mask. And according to Puck, approximately 100 units were available on launch day. One hundred units, after the most viral beauty moment in recent memory, after twelve months to prepare. The initial run sold out in six minutes, which proved the demand was still there. But a year in beauty is an eternity. The conversation had moved on and the brand had missed its own moment
But McGrath Understood this.
In 2016, McGrath created red glitter lips at Versace couture. Within months, she released Lust 004, a kit to recreate the look at home. The runway-to-retail pipeline was tight. Cultural moment converted directly into commercial momentum, exactly as this was supposed to work.
Go back further. Her first product, Gold 001, launched in October 2015; a pressed gold pigment packaged in a bag of gold sequins. It crashed her website and sold out in minutes. Within three years, the brand had a wall at Sephora and a billion-dollar valuation. The business had it figured out when the velocity arrived.
What’s confusing is that it degraded at some point. The question is how? According to several sources she’s apparently very involved in the business. McGrath is CEO, founder, and creative director, she has final say on everything from formulation to packaging. “Nothing has happened since the inception of this brand nor happens now without her approval,” wrote departing executive Rabih Hamdan in his farewell email. The question is whether her exacting standards, which created runway magic, made the company nearly impossible to run at scale?
The culture became known for midnight meetings and last-minute everything. Alison Hahn, the Sephora merchandiser who launched the brand into retail, told Allure that McGrath would start meetings at midnight. “Everything’s done at the last minute. That’s how she works.” The brand became known for airlifting Mothership palettes from China to Italy because production was perpetually behind. Employee turnover was high. In 2024 alone, there were three rounds of layoffs.
Hamdan left after less than a year. “The environment I had stepped into was not exactly what was depicted to me,” he wrote, “and in all fairness, I think no one really had the proper grip of the full situation.” In the same email, he thanked McGrath for endorsing “all the actions that needed to be taken” and noted that “it required many hard decisions to be taken promptly to set the fundamentals for a swift and sustainable turnaround.”
Retail contracted in parallel. The brand’s Sephora door count has fallen steadily since 2019. When Ulta picked up the line in 2023, they placed it in just 200 of their 1,400 North American stores. Products started appearing at Ross Dress for Less. And when the brand did invest in major marketing; a Steven Meisel campaign starring Naomi Campbell for the Divine Skin launch reportedly cost over $1 million, the returns didn’t follow. A 20-second YouTube ad got just over 3,000 views.
The counterexample writes itself. Charlotte Tilbury launched her namesake brand in 2013, two years before McGrath. Both were legendary makeup artists building consumer beauty empires. Both had the credibility, the celebrity access, the industry respect.
Today, Tilbury tops the Sunday Times Beauty Rich List at £350 million. Her brand was the UK’s most-mentioned beauty label on Instagram in 2024 and generated €355 million in earned media value over six months. The company does masterclasses, both in-person and online. Her niece Sofia creates constant content. The founder shows up, she engages with trends, participates in conversations, and makes herself available in ways that feel native to how consumers discover brands now.
McGrath famously declined an appearance in Vogue’s Hulu docuseries about the 1990s, an era whose look she helped define. In a moment when brand founders are expected to constantly interact with fans online, her reserved persona started to feel like another era. The artistic talent was never in question. What differed was the organizational architecture around that talent.
Tilbury built a company that could capitalize on cultural moments. McGrath built moments that her company couldn’t capitalize on. Same starting point. Radically different infrastructure. Radically different outcomes.
However, the underlying lesson here extends well beyond beauty; in fact, it’s the most important aspect of understanding virality.
Virality is a window, not a destination. When culture hands you a moment; a viral TikTok, an unexpected endorsement, a product that catches fire, the clock starts immediately. The audience’s attention is borrowed and not owned. If your operations can’t keep up with your cultural velocity, you’re not building momentum but watching it dissipate while someone else figures out how to serve the demand you created.
Pat McGrath’s artistry was never the problem and she remains one of the most influential makeup artists alive. She just landed the beauty director for Louis Vuitton’s La Beauté, their first-ever makeup line. Her creative reputation is undiminished, while her cultural relevance has never been higher. But creative genius without operational infrastructure has a ceiling. The skills that make you a visionary are not the same skills that scale a business. And in a category that moves as fast as beauty, where someone else can crack your secret in five days, the gap between inspiration and execution is where billion-dollar valuations go to die.
Im in LA this week for work, let me know if there are any killer brands I must check out, small, medium or big. I love getting recommendations from you all!
Xx Camille
If you want to listen to this weeks podcast episode head to Art of the Brand on all streaming platforms!






Increasing well written and thought-out! Look forward to reading more xC
Pat McGrath was and still is one of my favorite make up artists and such an inspiration. But I think the key difference between herself and Charlotte Tilbury (as an example) is that McGrath doesn’t have any interest in being a social media personality. She likes to focus on her artistry, and wants PMG Labs to run like a separate business, but social media requires her to be in front of the camera promoting the brand as a part of her own self.
Additionally, I’ve always found that Charlotte Tilbury’s products are a lot more consumer friendly (beautiful formulas but let’s be real, nothing super creative or innovative) whereas PMG heavily leans for artists. It’s much more of a niche market, and I think they would have performed better by separating their lines between a consumer-facing range (for Sephora) and then a limited drop artist range